ninkilim.com/9
Login

The scene is difficult. Since this morning, I have been walking among the tents of the displaced, and under the showers of rain, I lived the moments of the tents being flooded, and I witnessed the families shivering from the cold. I can't find words to describe what I saw. https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1874032723943457199

Israel is not a Jewish state #ืคื™ืงื•ื—ื ืคืฉ

In Judaism, the sanctity of life is a fundamental principle, with the Torah commanding, "You shall not murder" (Exodus 20:13). The Talmud expands on this, teaching that to save a life is to save the entire world (Sanhedrin 37a). Jewish law (Halakha) prioritizes the preservation of life (Pikuach Nefesh), often superseding other commandments in situations where life is at stake, highlighting life's paramount value.

The Sanctity of Life Across Religious Traditions: A Comparative Analysis

In the discourse of world religions, one of the most profound and universally upheld principles is the sanctity of life. This concept, while interpreted differently across various traditions, underpins the ethical frameworks of Buddhism, Hinduism, Christianity, Islam, and Judaism, serving as a cornerstone for discussions on human rights, international law, and moral conduct in the face of geopolitical conflicts.

Buddhism:

Buddhism, particularly in its Mahayana form, places immense value on the sanctity of all sentient life. The principle of Ahimsa (non-violence) is central, advocating for compassion towards all beings. The first precept in Buddhism, "I undertake the training rule to abstain from taking life," directly reflects this sanctity. The Buddhist perspective encourages the recognition of life's inherent value, promoting actions that preserve and protect life, which aligns with the broader theme of ethical living aimed at reducing suffering.

Hinduism:

In Hinduism, the sanctity of life is encapsulated in the concept of Ahimsa as well, which is a key tenet in various philosophical schools like Jainism and Yoga. The Bhagavad Gita (Chapter 13, verse 8) describes humility, non-violence, patience, and purity as divine qualities, emphasizing the importance of preserving life. The idea that all life forms possess a spark of the divine (Atman) further reinforces the sacredness of life, urging followers to respect and protect it.

Christianity:

The Christian doctrine is foundational in its assertion of the sanctity of life, rooted in the belief that humans are created in the image of God (Imago Dei). The commandment "Thou shalt not kill" (Exodus 20:13) is a direct scriptural mandate protecting human life. This principle is further elaborated in the New Testament, where Jesus teaches love and forgiveness, promoting peace and life over violence, as seen in the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5:38-42).

Islam:

Islam places a strong emphasis on the sanctity of life, with the Quran stating, "Whoever saves one life, it is as if he had saved mankind entirely" (Quran 5:32). This verse underscores the value of each individual life, making the preservation of life a communal and religious duty. The concept of Fitrah, the innate disposition towards good, includes an inherent respect for life, aligning with the broader Islamic ethos of justice, mercy, and compassion.

Judaism:

In Judaism, the sanctity of life is a fundamental principle, with the Torah commanding, "You shall not murder" (Exodus 20:13). The Talmud expands on this, teaching that to save a life is to save the entire world (Sanhedrin 37a). Jewish law (Halakha) prioritizes the preservation of life (Pikuach Nefesh), often superseding other commandments in situations where life is at stake, highlighting life's paramount value.

Common Elements and Modern Implications:

Across these traditions, several common elements emerge regarding the sanctity of life:

In the context of modern geopolitical conflicts, such as the situation in Palestine, these religious teachings provide a factual and argumentative foundation for advocating peace, justice, and the protection of human rights. The selective application or disregard of these principles, as seen in some responses to conflicts, represents a significant departure from the core teachings of these religions.

Arguments for Consistency:

This comparative analysis highlights that despite doctrinal differences, the sanctity of life remains a unifying thread across major world religions, providing a robust argument for its consistent application in addressing global issues of human rights and peace.

Nomadic and Trading Lifestyle

The Khazars were indeed known for their semi-nomadic lifestyle and their role as middlemen in trade between the Byzantine Empire, the Umayyad and later Abbasid Caliphates, and the emerging Slavic states. Their economy was heavily based on trade, taxing goods that passed through their territory, and occasional tribute from vassal states.

Compatibility with Judaism

Religious Practices of Christianity and Islam

Neutrality in Religious Conflicts

By converting to Judaism, the Khazars could maintain a degree of neutrality in the religious conflicts between their powerful neighbors, which was strategically advantageous. This choice could also have been seen as a way to strengthen their unique cultural identity amidst the pressures of these expanding religious powers.

While this perspective offers a plausible explanation for why the Khazars might have chosen Judaism over Christianity or Islam, it's important to remember that these are interpretations based on limited historical data. The actual motivations might have been a complex interplay of these factors or could include personal or political elements not well-documented or understood from our current historical vantage point.

At night, in the bitter cold, I was among the families living in displacement camps in northern Gaza. These camps were like a nightmare at the mercy of harsh nature. In the morning, I witnessed a family whose tent was flooded with rainwater, and at night, their suffering was repeated when the winds blew the tent away, leaving them homeless once again. Another scene was even more painful: families were trying hard to keep warm using what is known as โ€œasphalt,โ€ a dangerous and unhealthy method, but the only option available in light of the scarcity of resources. Black smoke filled the air, and children were trying to take shelter next to their fathers, while the sounds of the wind reminded them that this night might bring them new suffering.

87 Retweets but still only 4000 Impressions

X / Twitter / Musk is heavily manipulating here https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1873526338793165217

Human Dignity and Respect: The behavior depicted could be seen as disrespectful towards the local population, especially if this is indeed a private space or a home in Gaza. Such actions might mock or dehumanize the residents whose property it once was, aligning with sentiments expressed in discussions on military ethics regarding respect for civilian dignity during conflicts.

Military Conduct and Professionalism: From a military ethics perspective, the conduct shown here might not adhere to the standards expected of soldiers, who are supposed to maintain professionalism in conflict zones. This behavior could undermine the discipline and values military forces are expected to uphold.

Psychological and Moral Evaluation: The actions described and shown might be symptomatic of psychological issues or a moral disengagement under the stress of war. This could align with discussions around the effects of prolonged conflict on mental health, suggesting a need for psychological support or intervention.

Public Perception and Morality: Sharing such images publicly can lead to negative perceptions of the military involved, impacting both domestic and international views. The reactions in the thread indicate public outrage and moral indignation, which reflects on the behavior's perceived morality. Legal and Ethical Considerations: While the post does not provide legal analysis, the behavior could potentially violate military codes of conduct or international laws concerning the treatment of civilians in conflict zones, which might warrant disciplinary action.

In conclusion, the image and the behavior it depicts raise significant concerns regarding the respect for human dignity, military professionalism, the psychological well-being of soldiers, public perception, and legal implications, all of which are critical in understanding the broader context of the conflict in Gaza.

SAVAGE CRIMINAL LAND THIEVES

2023 Report on Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem (January December 2023)

The total number of settlement plans and tenders advanced by Israel in 2023 was higher than in 2022, outdoing 2022 as the year with the highest number of settlement advancements recorded since 2012. [1] In 2023, 18,333 housing units (HU) were advanced in occupied East Jerusalem while in the occupied West Bank, 12,349 HU were advanced, leading to a total of 30,682 HU advanced. While 2023 also saw a high number of advancements in East Jerusalem, the 12,349 HU advanced in the West Bank represented a sharp increase compared to 4,427 HU in 2022 For the West Bank, it was the highest number advanced since the signing of the Oslo Accords. The advancements in 2023 represent a 180 percent increase over a period of five years.

From the perspective of safeguarding a two state solution where Jerusalem could serve as a capital of both states, the Israeli settlement developments on the southern periphery of Jerusalem is severing the chances for contiguity between East Jerusalem and the West Bank. Construction in this area began on the first new settlement to be built in East Jerusalem in over 20 years, Givat Hamatos and a new settlement, the Lower Aqueduct, was fully approved just before the end of 2023. New settlement plans were also advanced in 2023 slated to be constructed within Palestinian neighbourhoods which has been known to cause friction.

In the West Bank, the majority of the settlement plans advanced were located deep into the West Bank. Israeli settlers also established 26 outposts the most outposts advanced in a year since 1991 and the government advanced the โ€œlegalisation" of 15 โ€œoutposts". [2] Israeli authorities also advanced a number of renewable energy sites in Area C, a serious development that undermines Palestinian development opportunities in Area C and add s to the permanency of the Israeli occupation. Another development of concern was the introduction of a โ€œsettlement administrationโ€ within the Ministry of Defense but under the authority of Finance Minister Smotrich (but in his capacity as a Minister within the MOD) Civil society organisations and legal experts argued that this add ed a layer of civilian oversight to the oPt that would be in contradiction to IHL where the temporary nature of the administration that serves the interest of the occupied population is supposed to be conducted by the military separate from the civilian administration of the occupying country This they argued would be blurring the line towards annexation.

Other trends and developments contributing to settlement expansion in the reporting period included advancements of infrastructure and road projects.

The rise in settlement expansion plans by the Israeli authorities was also accompanied by a worrisome trend of rising settler violence in the oPt. UN OCHA registered the highest number of incidents of settler violence in a year since the UN started recording such incidents in 2006. Settler violence notably spiked after 7 October. Settler violence was a major contributing source to the coercive environment of many Palestinian communities resulting in 1,539 Palestinians from 15 different communities, including 756 children being displaced from their homes in Area C.

The EU has repeatedly called on Israel not to proceed with plans under its settlement policy and to halt all settlement activities It remains the EUโ€™s firm position that settlements are illegal under international law. Israel's decision to advance plans for the approval and construction of new settlement units in 2023 further undermines the prospects of a viable two state solution.

Even Grok understands: However, the overarching need is for humanitarian aid that includes dry, warm clothing and better shelter options to combat the severe cold and wet conditions faced by residents in Gaza.

Thick Wet Clothes in Gaza:

Thin Wet Clothes in Gaza:

No Clothes in Gaza:

Contextual Considerations:

Given these conditions, practical solutions might involve:

There is no cold like this cold, Cold fear, And the soul is cold, And the cold of disappointment, And the cold of humanity, The cold of separation and the cold of loss, The cold of martyrs without graves, And the cold of the displaced in the tents, Endless cold, Be gentle with us, Lord.

<- Page 8
Page 10 ->