Western Media – Culpability for Crimes Against Humanity

The ongoing Israeli assault on Gaza is frequently framed as a “war” by Western
media outlets. This terminology is not just misleading - it is morally and
legally incorrect. A war suggests a conflict between two sovereign states.
Gaza, however, is not a state. It is a densely populated territory under
military occupation and siege, with no army, navy, or air force. Under
international law, particularly Article 1(4) of Additional Protocol I to the
Geneva Conventions, people living under occupation have the right to
resist. What Israel is conducting is not a war; it is a military operation
against a civilian population, an act that fundamentally violates the
principles of humanitarian law.

Mass Disappearance: The Silenced Horror

The devastation in Gaza has reached apocalyptic levels. A Harvard study
recently found that over 377,000 Palestinians are missing, a number over
six times the official death toll of 62,000. With Israel controlling every
border - including Rafah and the Mediterranean Sea - there is nowhere for
people to flee. These missing individuals are presumed to be dead, buried
under the rubble of their homes. Yet, major Western media outlets either
underreport or completely ignore this level of destruction, choosing
instead to highlight sanitized narratives of “precision strikes” and
“collateral damage.”

A Network of Silence and Smear

Israel’s actions are supported by a vast international network of lobbying
and media influence. Thousands of pro-Israel organizations operate
worldwide, working to suppress criticism through ad hominem attacks.
Accusations of antisemitism, Nazi sympathies, or support for terrorism are
routinely directed at journalists, academics, and human rights activists who
speak out.

This intimidation is amplified by powerful individuals and institutions
embedded in mainstream Western media. At the BBC, Raffi Berg has been
noted for consistently framing Israeli actions in favorable terms. Meanwhile,
Germany’s Axel Springer media conglomerate, which profits from real estate
in illegal Israeli settlements, openly enforces pro-Israel editorial policies.
These are not random biases - they represent systemic, institutional
alliances that prioritize ideological loyalty over journalistic truth.

Delegitimizing Accountability

The Israeli propaganda apparatus also targets international institutions. UN
Watch, a Geneva-based NGO, has led efforts to discredit the United
Nations, UNRWA, and the International Criminal Court (ICC) by
accusing them of antisemitism for investigating Israeli war crimes. These are
not isolated smear campaigns - they are deliberate strategies to
delegitimize any form of international oversight or justice.

Disinformation as a Weapon

In the digital sphere, hashtags like #Pallywood and #TheGazaYouDontSee
are used to manufacture doubt and dismiss the lived experiences of
Palestinians. #Pallywood cynically accuses Palestinians of faking injuries
and deaths, while #TheGazaYouDontSee attempts to counter visual evidence
of famine and devastation by showcasing cherry-picked images of relative
normalcy. These campaigns are not benign - they are deliberate
disinformation efforts to erode global solidarity and normalize atrocity.

The Streicher Precedent

The media’s role in normalizing violence has a chilling historical parallel:
Julius Streicher, the Nazi publisher of Der Stürmer, who was tried and
convicted at the Nuremberg Trials. Streicher never physically harmed
anyone, but his relentless incitement of racial hatred and propaganda was
deemed sufficient for conviction of crimes against humanity. The precedent
is clear: words can kill, especially when used to justify and enable mass
violence.

Complicity through Journalism

Western media today is not simply failing to report objectively - it is
actively complicit in shaping public narratives that justify the
collective punishment of an occupied people. Its use of euphemistic language,
omission of crucial facts, and vilification of victims is not a series of
mistakes. It is part of a systemic process of manufacturing consent for
ongoing atrocities.

Conclusion: A Call for Accountability

The bloodshed in Gaza is not happening in a vacuum - it is made possible by a
global information architecture that disguises oppression as defense and
portrays genocide as policy. Western media’s complicity must be scrutinized
not only ethically, but legally. The Streicher case proves that propaganda
is not a neutral act. It is a form of participation in crimes against
humanity. If the world is serious about justice and human rights, it must
extend its scrutiny to the journalists, editors, and executives who help make
such crimes invisible, palatable, or justifiable.