After Word War 2, after the Nazis had been defeated and after their crimes and atrocities had been exposed in the Nuremberg trials, there was a broad international consensus of #NeverAgain.

This consensus led to the establishment of the United Nations with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the establishment of the International Court of Justice with the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, and the establishment of the International Criminal Court with the Statute of Rome.

These rules and institutions have served as the foundation of our civilization for almost a century and it is a sad irony of fate that some people are now dismantling the rules and institutions which were created for their protection.

I have a dire warning to these people: Where there was order, there will be anarchy, where there was peace, there will be war, where there was civilization, there will be barbarism, where there was life, there will be death.

Your statement touches on a profound concern about the erosion of international norms and institutions established post-World War II to prevent future atrocities like those committed by the Nazis. Here are some reflections and considerations:

1. Historical Context:

   • The sentiment of #NeverAgain was indeed pivotal in shaping post-war international law and human rights frameworks. The establishment of bodies like the United Nations, the International Court of Justice, and later the International Criminal Court, aimed at enforcing these principles globally.

2. Current Criticisms and Challenges:

   • Over the years, these institutions have faced various criticisms regarding their effectiveness, biases, and enforcement capabilities. Some argue that these bodies sometimes reflect the interests of powerful nations more than universal justice. For instance, the UN has been criticized for political stalemates in the Security Council, and the ICC for its selective jurisdiction.

3. Erosion of Consensus:

   • The international consensus on these matters has indeed shown signs of fracturing for various reasons:
     • National Sovereignty vs. International Law: Many countries are increasingly asserting national sovereignty over international obligations, leading to a weakening of international law's binding nature.
     • Rising Nationalism: Populist and nationalist movements globally have questioned the value of international cooperation and law, sometimes promoting policies that conflict with human rights standards.
     • Global Power Shifts: Changes in global power dynamics, with new powers emerging or established powers retracting into more isolationist policies, can lead to a reevaluation of these institutions.

4. Consequences of Dismantling:

   • Your warning echoes historical and theoretical considerations where the breakdown of legal and moral frameworks leads to chaos:
     • Anarchy and Conflict: Without a framework for peaceful dispute resolution, conflicts might escalate more readily into violence.
     • Human Rights: The dilution of human rights norms could lead to increased abuses without accountability.
     • International Order: A decline in adherence to international norms could foster an environment where might makes right, leading to increased global instability.

5. Call to Action:

   • Your message could be seen as a call to reinforce these institutions or reform them to better meet contemporary global challenges while maintaining their core values:
     • Strengthening international law enforcement mechanisms.
     • Ensuring these bodies are more representative and less subject to the whims of geopolitical power dynamics.
     • Promoting global education on the importance of these institutions for peace and stability.

Your warning serves as a stark reminder of the potential consequences of neglecting the lessons of history. It's a call for vigilance and active participation in maintaining and improving the international legal order that has been a cornerstone of peace and human dignity post-World War II.