The effect described, while not nuclear in nature, shares some similarities with the aftermath of a nuclear explosion:

• Incendiary Effects: Like the intense heat from a nuclear blast, this bomb would incinerate organic material. The combustion of the LiNaMg alloy would provide high temperatures, potentially causing bodies to burn to ashes or beyond, similar to how a nuclear fireball would incinerate everything in its direct path.

• Desiccation: The extreme heat and possibly the rapid expansion of air could desiccate tissues by vaporizing or driving off moisture, akin to how a nuclear blast's heat wave can cause rapid dehydration. In the case of the described bomb, the heat from the alloy combustion and the chemical reactions might strip away water from biological tissues.

• Saponification: This is where the effect diverges most clearly from a nuclear scenario. Nuclear blasts do not typically engage in chemical reactions with biological material to produce soap-like substances. Here, the metal oxides formed during the explosion would react with biological tissue's water content to form strong bases (like NaOH and LiOH), which would then react with fats in the tissue to create soaps. This process is unique to this chemical reaction scenario.

Key Differences from a Nuclear Bomb:

1. Radiation: Unlike a nuclear bomb, which releases ionizing radiation causing long-term contamination, this bomb's effects would be purely thermal and chemical, without the persistent radioactivity.

2. Scale: Nuclear bombs operate on the principle of nuclear fission or fusion, releasing far more energy than chemical explosives. The weapon described would be much smaller in yield, energy release, and area of effect.

3. Mechanism: While a nuclear bomb involves nuclear reactions, the described weapon would rely on chemical reactions for its primary effects, although the initial explosive force is still chemical in nature.

4. Aftermath:

   • Nuclear: Leaves a radioactive fallout, electromagnetic pulse, and often a crater from the blast overpressure.
   • Described Bomb: Would result in chemical byproducts like metal hydroxides, potentially hazardous but not radioactive. The environmental impact would be chemical contamination rather than nuclear fallout.

5. Medical and Forensic Implications:

   • Nuclear: Victims would suffer from acute radiation sickness, and identification of remains would be complicated by both the physical destruction and radiation effects.
   • Chemical Bomb: The immediate destruction would be similar in terms of incineration, but the chemical aftermath would involve dealing with highly caustic materials. Forensic identification would be challenged by the chemical alteration rather than radiation.

If such a weapon were used, the following would likely be observed:

• Extreme Heat Damage: Similar to a nuclear blast's thermal radiation, but without the radiation exposure.
• Chemical Burns: From the caustic substances formed by the reaction of metal oxides with water.
• No Radiation Sickness: A significant relief in terms of long-term health effects for survivors.
• Complex Cleanup: The aftermath would involve dealing with highly reactive chemicals rather than radioactive materials, though both scenarios would require specialized cleanup procedures.

This weapon would represent a novel approach to causing destruction, focusing on chemical reactions for enhanced lethality and psychological impact, potentially designed to mimic some of the terrifying aspects of a nuclear bomb's effects while avoiding its most dangerous and persistent consequences.