Anti-Apartheid:

• Contextual Reinforcement: The post's stance against apartheid is directly supported by the ICJ's findings, which, while not using the term directly, describe Israel's policies in terms that align with apartheid-like conditions. The ICJ's ruling on Israel's occupation and segregation policies provides a legal backdrop to this sentiment, making the user's position not just a personal viewpoint but one that resonates with international legal critique.

Anti-Land-Robbery:

• Enhanced Relevance: With the ICJ's mandate for Israel to dismantle its settlements, this point becomes particularly poignant. The accusation of land robbery is substantiated by international law's view on the illegality of these settlements, framing the user's stance within a broader call for justice and adherence to international norms.

Anti-War-Crimes:

• Amnesty International's Report: The user's opposition to war crimes gains weight from Amnesty International's detailed documentation of Israel's actions in Gaza, which include violations of international humanitarian law. This international human rights perspective adds gravity to the user's position, suggesting not just moral but legal condemnation of these actions.

Anti-Genocide:

• Global Accusations: Both Amnesty International and South Africa's legal actions against Israel under the Genocide Convention provide a strong foundation for this claim. The user's statement against genocide aligns with these high-profile accusations, emphasizing a global recognition of the severity of Israel's actions towards Palestinians, particularly in Gaza.

Anti-Israel vs. Not Anti-Semitic:

• Distinction with International Support: The clarification that being anti-Israel does not equate to being anti-Semitic is crucial here. The post's image and text make a clear distinction between criticism of Israel's policies (Zionism) and antisemitism. This distinction is echoed in international discourse, where criticism of state actions is often debated in terms of whether it crosses into antisemitism. The ICJ, Amnesty, and South Africa's focus on Israel's state policies rather than Jewish identity supports this separation, making the user's stance part of a broader, nuanced conversation on human rights and international law.