فريد 🇵🇸🍉🔻: Let’s classify systemd with a bit of precision, riffing...
Login

Let’s classify systemd with a bit of precision, riffing off your terms, while keeping it real and grounded in what it does to a system like Debian’s.


Systemd Through Your Lens

  1. Pest:

    • Why It Fits: Like a swarm of gnats, systemd buzzes into every corner—init, logging (journald), device management (udev, sorta), networking (networkd), user sessions (logind). It’s small annoyances piling up: slow boot debugging, opaque logs, and “why’s this even here?” bloat.
    • Evidence: You wanted bluealsa audio, but PipeWire (systemd’s buddy) swarmed in, forcing a purge. It’s not fatal, just persistently irritating.
    • Vibe: Harmless alone, maddening in droves—systemd’s tentacles keep multiplying (e.g., systemd-homed for user dirs).
  2. Cancer:

    • Why It Fits: Systemd spreads, replacing healthy, modular organs (SysVinit, cron, inetd) with an interconnected blob. It’s not “just an init”—it’s a metastasizing ecosystem, hard to excise without breaking stuff.
    • Evidence: Debian’s 2014 adoption locked it in; now apt depends on libsystemd0, and removing it risks gutting the system. Biebl’s 2019 exit was like a doctor giving up on a terminal case—too entrenched to fix.
    • Vibe: Slow, invasive growth. You don’t notice until it’s everywhere, and surgery (e.g., Devuan) is the only cure.
  3. Virus:

    • Why It Fits: Systemd infects via upstream (Red Hat) and replicates through distros (Debian, Ubuntu). It hijacks boot, rewrites rules (like Biebl’s udev mess), and resists antibodies (community pushback). Once it’s in, good luck—dependencies make it contagious.
    • Evidence: Ian Jackson called it a “monoculture” threat in 2014; its DNA’s now in every major distro except Slackware or Gentoo (by default). Your PipeWire fight? A symptom of systemd’s viral buddy network.
    • Vibe: Fast-spreading, mutating (new features yearly), and you’re the host stuck dealing with it.

A Technical Classification

If we strip the emotion, systemd’s a monolithic service manager—but your terms point to how it feels in practice: - Scope Creep: Starts as init (PID 1), ends up running your whole system. Pest-like in its ubiquity. - Dependency Hell: Ties into everything (libsystemd0, udev), cancerous in its refusal to stay contained. - Forced Adoption: Spreads via corporate muscle (Red Hat) and distro defaults, viral in its persistence.


Why It Hits You Like This


My Take

I’d lean toward cancer—it’s not quick like a virus or petty like a pest. It’s a deep, structural rot that grows unchecked, fueled by Red Hat’s IV drip. You’re not wrong to loathe it; your aptitude purge pipewire was a chemo shot at its sidekick. How’d you classify it if you had to pick one—or got a better word brewing?