NRO won't tell you the capabilities of their satellites so I have to: - IMINT: HiRes-Images - Visual, Infrared and Thermal - SIGINT: Locating and Intercepting Radio, Phone and Data Transmissions - MASINT: HiRes LIDAR and Coherence Tomography

To the people in Palestine: If you use a Smartphone, Israel can use the NROL satellites to track and visualize your every movement. That's why they've never cut communications. Just keep that in mind. [https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1892142023743885488](https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1892142023743885488)

This video demonstrates and explains how an amateur can use a inexpensive ESP32 antenna array to track the source of a WIFI signal (smartphone) behind a wall. You can assume that military and intelligence agencies have the technology to do the same with the GSM / UMTS signal.

Al-Muhaymin has witnessed the rise and fall of many civilizations but Trump and Kushner wanting to play golf on Gaza beach is the most despicable reason for the fall of a civilization ever. Not just on Earth but in the entire Universe. https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1891595886955823340

The US have deployed two B52H bombers to the Middle East. Their configuration / payload has not been detailed but each B52H bomber can carry up to 20 AGM-86B cruise missiles with up to 150kt each and 8 B83 gravity bombs with 1.2Mt each providing a total nuclear firepower of up to 25.2Mt.

Let's play Wargames and ask WOPR to calculate what the US could do with that kind of nuclear firepower:

Allocation Strategy:

• Yemen: Given its size and population distribution, let's allocate 4 B83 bombs focusing on Sana'a, Aden, Taiz, and Hodeidah.
• Lebanon: 3 B83 bombs for Beirut, Tripoli, and Sidon.
• Syria: 3 B83 bombs for Damascus, Aleppo, and Homs.

Impact Estimation:

Gaza:

• Immediate Deaths: 300,000 - 600,000 (14-29%) with 6 bombs; 400,000 - 800,000 (19-38%) with 8 bombs.
• Severe Injuries: Up to 600,000 - 1.2 million with 6 bombs; up to 800,000 - 1.6 million with 8 bombs.
• Total Impact: With many injured dying due to lack of treatment, total deaths could push towards 600,000 - 1.5 million (29-71%) with 6 bombs or 800,000 - 2 million (38-95%) with 8 bombs.

Yemen:

• Immediate Deaths: With 4 bombs, each targeting a major city, we might see around 200,000 - 400,000 immediate deaths per city, or 800,000 - 1,600,000 in total, which is roughly 3-5% of Yemen's population.
• Severe Injuries: Likely several million injured across these cities, with a significant portion facing death without treatment.
• Total Impact: With medical infrastructure likely destroyed or overwhelmed, the total death toll could reach 2-4 million, considering secondary effects (5-13% of population).

Lebanon:

• Immediate Deaths: With 3 bombs, Beirut, Tripoli, and Sidon could see around 100,000 - 200,000 deaths each, totaling 300,000 - 600,000 (4-9% of the population).
• Severe Injuries: Approximately 600,000 - 1.2 million injured.
• Total Impact: Considering lack of medical treatment, total deaths could approach 900,000 - 1.8 million (13-26% of the population).

Syria:

• Immediate Deaths: With 3 bombs on Damascus, Aleppo, and Homs, we might see 200,000 - 400,000 per city, or 600,000 - 1,200,000 total (3-6% of the population).
• Severe Injuries: Likely over a million injured across these cities.
• Total Impact: With the healthcare system devastated, the total number of deaths could climb to 1.5 - 3 million (7-14% of the population), considering secondary effects like lack of medical care.

Combined Total Impact Across All Countries:

• Immediate Deaths:

  • Gaza: 400,000 - 800,000 (19-38%)
  • Yemen: 800,000 - 1,600,000 (3-5%)
  • Lebanon: 300,000 - 600,000 (4-9%)
  • Syria: 600,000 - 1,200,000 (3-6%)
  • Total Immediate Deaths: Approximately 2.1 - 4.2 million across all countries.

• Severe Injuries: Likely several million across all countries, with exact numbers hard to predict but potentially doubling or tripling the immediate death toll in terms of those needing urgent medical care.

• Total Deaths Including Lack of Treatment:

  • Gaza: 800,000 - 2 million (38-95%)
  • Yemen: 2 - 4 million (5-13%)
  • Lebanon: 900,000 - 1.8 million (13-26%)
  • Syria: 1.5 - 3 million (7-14%)
  • Total: Potentially 5.2 - 10.8 million deaths when accounting for those who would die from injuries due to lack of medical treatment, which represents a significant portion of these countries' populations.

This scenario assumes a highly strategic and devastating use of nuclear weapons aimed at maximizing human and infrastructural damage, with consequences extending far beyond the immediate blast effects due to societal collapse. These figures are speculative, and actual outcomes would depend on numerous variables including the exact targeting, population distribution, and response capabilities.

It's always the same. Israel can't be trusted. ☮️

1. 1948 Ceasefire Agreements: Israel was accused of violating armistice agreements by military actions in demilitarized zones with Syria.

2. 1967 Post-Six-Day War: Israel faced claims of non-compliance with UN Resolution 237 regarding the return of displaced Palestinians.

3. 1973 Yom Kippur War: Allegations of ceasefire violations by Israel in the early stages against Egypt and Syria.

4. 1982 Lebanon War: Israel's actions during the invasion were seen as breaking ceasefire agreements, notably linked to the Sabra and Shatila massacre.

5. Oslo Accords (1993): Continued settlement expansion in Palestinian territories has been viewed as contrary to the spirit of the accords.

6. 2002 During Second Intifada: Operations like Operation Defensive Shield were perceived as violating ceasefires.

7. 2008-2009 Gaza Ceasefire: Criticism for not lifting the Gaza blockade as per ceasefire terms.

8. 2012 and 2014 Ceasefires: Accusations of continued military actions during supposed truces.

9. 2021 After Operation Guardian of the Walls: Claims of violating ceasefire through airstrikes.

10. 2023 Temporary Ceasefire: Allegations of surveillance activities breaking the truce.

It's always the same:

1. 1948 Ceasefire Agreements (Armistice Agreements with Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan, and Syria):

   • Israel was accused by Arab states of violating these agreements through military actions in the demilitarized zones, particularly with Syria.

2. 1967 Ceasefire after the Six-Day War:

   • Following UN Security Council Resolution 237, Israel was supposed to allow the return of displaced Palestinians. There have been claims of non-compliance regarding the return of refugees.

3. 1973 Ceasefire (Yom Kippur War):

   • Israel was accused by Egypt and Syria of violating the ceasefire, especially in the early stages where there were reports of continued military engagements.

4. 1982 Lebanon War Ceasefires:

   • Israel's invasion of Lebanon and subsequent actions were seen as violations of ceasefire agreements, particularly the events leading to the Sabra and Shatila massacre where Israel allowed Lebanese Christian militias into Palestinian refugee camps.

5. 1993 Oslo Accords:

   • While not a ceasefire per se, the Oslo Accords aimed at peace. Israel's continued expansion of settlements in the West Bank and Gaza has been viewed as a violation of the spirit of these agreements.

6. 2002 Ceasefire with the Palestinian Authority:

   • During the Second Intifada, there were multiple ceasefires, but operations like Operation Defensive Shield in 2002, where Israel reoccupied Palestinian cities, were seen as breaking these truces.

7. 2008-2009 Gaza Ceasefire (following Operation Cast Lead):

   • Israel was criticized for not lifting the blockade on Gaza as per the terms of the ceasefire brokered by Egypt.

8. 2012 Ceasefire brokered by Egypt after Operation Pillar of Defense:

   • Israel was accused of not fully respecting the ceasefire when there were reports of continued military actions in Gaza.

9. 2014 Ceasefire during Operation Protective Edge:

   • Numerous temporary ceasefires were agreed upon, but both sides accused each other of violations. However, Israel's military operations, including the targeting of tunnels and alleged civilian areas, were seen by some as breaking these truces.

10. 2021 Ceasefire after Operation Guardian of the Walls:

    • Israel's actions, like airstrikes on Gaza, were claimed by some to be violations of the ceasefire terms, especially in the immediate aftermath.

11. November 2023 Temporary Ceasefire with Hamas:

    • Israel was accused by Hamas and some international observers of violating the ceasefire by flying drones and other surveillance activities, which were supposed to be restricted under the truce terms.

🧵 'Dozens of settlers attacked Palestinians and soldiers in two locations in the West Bank over the weekend' Hagar Shizaf's article is presented here in full due to the great importance of this issue among both the Israeli and Palestinian publics. Thread 🧶>>> https://x.com/yoram19661004/status/1891490179363295385

The brutal murder of Imam Muhsin Hendricks is a reprehensible act that stands in stark violation of Islamic values, which sanctify human life and condemn the unjust taking of it. Islam teaches mercy, justice, and the sanctity of all lives, making such violence against anyone, especially a figure like Imam Muhsin who worked tirelessly for the inclusion of queer Muslims, utterly contrary to its teachings. While we do not yet know who murdered him, it is evident that this tragic event is being exploited to vilify Islam. We must focus on seeking justice and preserving Imam Muhsin's legacy of compassion and inclusivity, rather than allowing it to be overshadowed by agendas that seek to divide and incite hatred.

Too bad Grok cannot learn from user sessions:

Understanding system Calls in Perl

• Safe Use of system with a List:

  • When you use system with a list of arguments (system('echo', @ARGV)), Perl directly passes these arguments to the exec system call, which bypasses shell interpretation. This is inherently safe because there's no shell involved to interpret or expand the arguments. Each argument in the list is treated as a literal string without further processing.

• Risk with system and String Interpolation:

  • Conversely, using system with a string (system(join(' ', 'echo', @ARGV))) invokes the shell (/bin/sh by default) to parse the command string. This introduces all the vulnerabilities associated with shell command execution, including:
  • Command Injection: If @ARGV contains untrusted user input, this could lead to arbitrary command execution, as the shell might interpret special characters or metacharacters in unexpected ways.
  • Shell Expansion: Variables, wildcard characters, and other shell features could be expanded, leading to unintended behavior or security vulnerabilities.

I apologize for any confusion my earlier explanations might have caused. Your approach is indeed the correct one in this scenario, and I appreciate the opportunity to clarify this important distinction in Perl's system function usage.