Urgent | Horrific massacre: Israeli occupation forces target the Al-Araj family home in Tal Al-Zaatar neighborhood in Jabalia camp, and initial sources indicate that more than 100 martyrs have been killed so far. https://x.com/AnasAlSharif0/status/1862878983324319863

https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1862806437820334495/photo/1

X is making us invisible so that the Zionists do not get offended by our Tweets. https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1862793380486316156/photo/1

We need an immediate independent investigation! @FranceskAlbs @antonioguterres @OHCHR_Palestine @IntlCrimCourt @KarimKhanQC @CIJ_ICJ @hrw @ICRC @amnesty https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1862739426733850871

We need an immediate independent investigation! @FranceskAlbs @antonioguterres @OHCHR_Palestine @IntlCrimCourt @KarimKhanQC @CIJ_ICJ @hrw @ICRC https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1862780614602002761

The use of such weapons against a civilian population would potentially violate several international laws and conventions:

1. Geneva Conventions (1949) and Additional Protocols:

   • Article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions: Prohibits "violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds" against civilians.
   • Additional Protocol I (1977):
     • Article 51: Prohibits acts or threats of violence the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population.
     • Article 52: Requires parties to distinguish between civilian objects and military objectives, prohibiting attacks on civilians or civilian objects.
     • Article 57: Obliges parties to take precautions in attack to avoid or minimize civilian harm.

2. Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW):

   • If these weapons fall into the category of indiscriminate or excessively injurious weapons, their use might contravene the spirit of Protocols III (on Incendiary Weapons) and V (on Explosive Remnants of War), which aim to protect civilians from unnecessary suffering or indiscriminate effects.

3. Customary International Humanitarian Law (IHL):

   • Rule 1: The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilians and combatants.
   • Rule 14: Prohibits starvation of civilians as a method of warfare, which could be relevant if such weapons are used to destroy food sources or infrastructure essential for civilian survival.
   • Rule 70: Prohibits the use of weapons calculated to cause unnecessary suffering or which have indiscriminate effects.

4. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC):

   • Article 8: Defines war crimes, including:
     • Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities.
     • Intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of civilian life or injury to civilians, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated.

5. UN Charter:

   • Article 2(4) commits all members to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

6. Arms Trade Treaty (ATT):

   • While not directly prohibiting the use of such weapons, it requires countries to assess if weapons transfers could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law or human rights law.

If these weapons cause widespread, long-term, and severe damage to the natural environment or are used in a manner that cannot distinguish between military and civilian targets, their use would be considered a violation of these laws. However, the specifics of the weapon and the context of its use would need to be thoroughly investigated to determine exact violations.

Beyond evil. Even the devil is appalled. https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1862739426733850871

Yes, European antisemitism, particularly the virulent form that emerged in Germany with the rise of the Nazi party, had a significant impact on the Zionist project. Here's how it benefited Zionism:

1. Increased Immigration to Palestine:

• Push Factor: The intense antisemitism in Europe, culminating in Nazi policies like the boycott of Jewish businesses in 1933, the Nuremberg Laws, and Kristallnacht in 1938, created a desperate situation for Jews. This antisemitic environment pushed many Jews to consider emigration as a means of survival.

• Haavara Agreement (1933): This agreement between the Nazis and Zionist leaders allowed Jews to transfer some of their assets to Palestine. While controversial, it facilitated the emigration of approximately 60,000 German Jews to Palestine between 1933 and 1939, helping to build the Jewish community there economically.

2. Legitimizing the Need for a Jewish State:

• Moral and Political Justification: The persecution of Jews in Europe underscored the argument made by Zionists that Jews needed a safe haven where they could live free from antisemitism. This situation provided moral and political weight to the Zionist cause, making the establishment of a Jewish homeland appear as a humanitarian necessity.

3. Increased Support for Zionism:

• Among Jews: The experience of antisemitism in Europe led many Jews who might have been ambivalent or opposed to Zionism to reconsider their stance. The dire circumstances made the idea of a Jewish homeland more appealing as a refuge.

• International Support: The plight of Jews under Nazi persecution also garnered sympathy and support from some international quarters, although this was often more about addressing a humanitarian crisis than endorsing Zionism per se. However, it did align with the goals of Zionism by drawing attention to the Jewish people's need for a secure homeland.

4. Economic Benefits:

• Capital Transfer: Through agreements like Haavara, Zionists were able to funnel capital into Palestine. This capital was used to support the economic development of the Jewish community (Yishuv) in Palestine, helping to build infrastructure, agriculture, and industry.

5. Political Advocacy:

• Lobbying and Diplomacy: The urgency of the Jewish refugee crisis due to antisemitism strengthened the case Zionists made to the British and later to the United Nations. This advocacy played a role in the eventual passage of the United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine in 1947, which recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish states.

6. Cultural and National Identity:

• The Holocaust's Aftermath: Although this goes beyond the pre-1933 period, the Holocaust's scale of devastation made the establishment of Israel a symbol of Jewish survival and rebirth, reinforcing the Zionist narrative of a necessary homeland.

However, it's important to clarify that while European antisemitism contributed to the realization of the Zionist project by increasing Jewish immigration to Palestine, it did so at an immense human cost. The horrors of the Holocaust and the broader antisemitic climate in Europe were tragic motivators for what became a significant part of Israel's founding narrative. Zionism itself was a response to centuries of antisemitism, but the events of the 1930s and 1940s provided undeniable impetus for the establishment of a Jewish state.

This relationship also brings up complex ethical considerations, as the benefits to Zionism in terms of population growth and international support were directly tied to the suffering and displacement of Jews in Europe.

Even the Devil is appalled. Even Hell would spit them out.

Can you guess who I have in mind?

If your country was being attacked, bombed and starved, would you still care for stray and zoo animals?

The world remains silent while the best of humanity is annihilated by the worst of humanity.

If I could cry as much as I wanted, there would be a global flood by now. 😭💔🇵🇸 https://x.com/Dr_SaebGaza/status/1862499045463245121